Let’s highlight some advantages and disadvantages of asymmetric keys. One, asymmetric encryption requires fewer keys where symmetric encryption requires more keys than asymmetric encryption. Second, asymmetric keys require more processing due to large amounts of data; here the private key is kept secret data. This fact can be contributed to either one key to encrypt or another to decrypt. So, the public key is made available to anyone; the private key is kept secret asymmetric encryption facts. This is key due to the level of secrecy in the given scenario.
Chiefly, asymmetric encryption would better to appear here, because of it’s confidentially. For example, asymmetric encryption uses a Digital Sign which is an electronic signature that can be used to authenticate the identity of the sender of a message or the signer of a document, and possibly to ensure that the original content of the message or document that has been sent is unchanged or the integrity of the message and the authenticity of the sender.
Also, asymmetric encryption uses interrelated keys that are different. Meaning both the sender and receiver initially create original keys, the file/folder. When an authority wishes to encrypt a file/folder there are options like the ability to use passwords or keys. Here data disclosure can be insured, if all the information was encrypted. Basically, using the file/folder approach ensures the encryption of all of the proper
Above all, the information needs to be protected and upon this math I wouldn’t recommend that both have access to the private information. Asymmetric encryption for example is best practiced knowing that for every 2,000 symmetric keys there’s 1,000 asymmetric keys. This solution uses a PGP web of trust for private key technology. Asymmetric encryption might be slower, but using asymmetric encryption ensures confidentially and generates integrity among IT professionals.